|
Symposium
|
Contributions
|
| Leif Wenar’s – Blood Oil: Tyrants, Violence and the Rules That Run the World | New Symposium: Leif Wenar’s Blood Oil: Tyrants, Violence and the Rules that Run the World, James G. Stewart |
| Blood Oil and the Individual Consumer, Christian Barry (Australian National University) |
| Blood Oil: A Plea for Progressive Reform or a Philosopher’s Utopia? Phobe Okowa (Queen Mary University of London) |
| Ending the Tyranny of Anonymous Commodities: Trade Rules Can End the Laundering of Stolen Goods and Improve Governance in Producing Countries, Philippe Le Billon (UBC) |
| Wenar’s New Right to Democratic Entitlement Through Peoples’ Sovereignty over Natural Resources, James G. Stewart |
| A Clarion Call, Simon Taylor and Charmian Gooch (Global Witness) (forthcoming) |
| Response to Commentaries, Leif Wenar (King’s College, London) (forthcoming) |
|
Leora Bilsky’s – The Holocaust,
Corporations and the Law: Unfinished Business
|
New
Symposium: Leora Bilsky’s The Holocaust, Corporations and the Law, James
G. Stewart
|
| Corporate Responsibility for International Crimes: Problems of Civil Procedure and Collective Guilt, Chimène Keitner (UC Hastings Law) |
| How Private Law Could Help with “Unfinished Business”: A Comment on Leora Bilsky’s The Holocaust, Corporations and the Law, Mayo Moran (Toronto) |
| Transnational Holocaust Litigation and Corporate Accountability for Atrocity, Joanna Kyriakakis (Monash) |
| Transnational Holocaust Litigation and Corporate Accountability for Atrocity Beyond Nuremberg, Annika van Baar (Utrecht) |
| Transnational Corporate Accountability: How to Finish Unfinished Business? Franziska Oehm (Ernlangen-Nürnberg) |
| Towards Synergies between Forms of Corporate Accountability, James G. Stewart |
| The Virtues of Hybridity: Response to Symposium Contributions, Leora Bilsky (Tel Aviv) |
|
Saif Ansari & James G. Stewart,
Rohingya Deportation
|
Part 2 – Deportation
is a Distinct Crime in the ICC Statute
|
| Part 1 – Whether Deportation and Forcible Transfer are a Single Crime is Irrelevant to ICC Jurisdiction |
|
John Tasioulas’ – Minimum Core Obligations in Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights
|
New
Symposium: John Tasioulas’ Minimum Core Obligations in Economic, Cultural and
Social Rights, James G. Stewart
|
| Minimum Core Obligations: Toward a Deeper Philosophical Inquiry, Martha C. Nussbaum (Chicago) |
| Minimum Core Obligations and the Right to Health: A Legal Analysis, The Honourable Michael Kirby (Formerly, High Court of Australia) |
| Ensuring the Minimum Core Encompasses the Right to Health-Promoting Environments, Sarah Hawkes (UCL) |
| The Immediacy of Economic and Social Rights, Katharine Young (Boston College) |
| The Concept of ‘Minimum Core Obligations’: Guidance for International Obligations, Gorik Ooms (Georgetown) |
| Conceptualizing Minimum Core Beyond Affordable Goods and Services – Trade for Human Rights as a Minimum Core Obligation, Sakiko Fukunda-Parr (New School) |
| Doctrinal Weaknesses, Faulty Assumptions, and Short-Termism: Problems with the Minimum Core, Max Harris (Oxford) |
| Working on the Core: A Response to Commentators, John Tasioulas (King’s College London) |
|
James G. Stewart and Asad G. Kiyani’s –
The Ahistoricism of Legal Pluralism in International Criminal Justice
|
New
Symposium: The Ahistoricism of Legal Pluralism in International Criminal
Justice
|
| A Comparatist View on Doctrinal Diversity in International Criminal Law, Neha Jain (Minnesota) |
| Understanding Global Legal Pluralism and International Criminal Law, Paul Schiff Berman (George Washington) |
| Legal Pluralism as a Dynamic Process in a Moving World, Mireille Delmas-Marty (Collège de France) |
| What Does it Mean for International Criminal Law to Conform to Local Values?, Kevin E. Davis (NYU) |
| The Inherent Pluralism of International Criminal Law, Sasha Greenawalt (Pace) |
| Pluralism and the Alegitimacy of International Criminal Law, Markus Dubber (University of Toronto) |
| Legal Pluralism and History: A Reply to Critics, Asad Kiyani (Victoria) |
| Legal Pluralism and Justice: A Reply to Critics, James G. Stewart |
|
Colleen Murphy’s – The Conceptual
Foundations of Transitional Justice
|
New
Symposium: The Conceptual Foundations of Transitional Justice
|
| Practical Reflections on Conceptual Foundations, Roger Duthie and David Tolbert (International Center for Transitional Justice) |
| Defining the Field and its Moral Challenge, Laurel E. Fletcher (International Human Rights Clinic at UC Berkeley, School of Law) |
| Compartmentalizing Transitional Justice, James G. Stewart |
| Fragility, Authority and the Ethics of Transitions, Nir Eisikovits (University of Massachusetts Boston) |
| Appraising Transitional Justice Through the Just War Theory Analogue, Steven R. Ratner (University of Michigan Law School) |
|
Personal Blog
|
Beyond
Customary International Law: What Jesner Can Learn from Corporate Criminal
Liability for International Crimes, by James G. Stewart & Franziska
Oehm
|
|
My – The Strangely Familiar History of
the Unitary Theory of Perpetration
|
New
Symposium: The Strangely Familiar History of the Unitary Theory of
Perpetration
|
| A Unitary Theory of Perpetration? New Zealand and a Touch of the International, Judge Sir David Baragwanath, Judge at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (New Zealand) |
| Theories of Blame Attribution in Brazilian Law, Professor Carlos Eduardo A. Japiassú (Brazil) |
| The Unitary Form of Participation in Danish Criminal Law (and its Potential Use in International Criminal Law), Professor Iryna Marchuk (Denmark) |
| Norway: Three Codes, Three (Somewhat Different) Solutions, Professor Jørn Jacobsen (Norway) |
| A Unitary Theory is Both Viable and Preferable, Filippo De Minicis, Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (Italy) |
| Questions from the Unconvinced, Professor Albin Eser, formerly Judge International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (Germany) |
| An Open Invitation to Further Debate (Instead of an Amicus Brief), James G. Stewart |
|
Personal Blog
|
The
Historical Significance of the Kouwenhoven Trial, by James G. Stewart
|
|
Steven Ratner’s – The Thin Justice of
International Law
|
New
Symposium: Introducing Ratner’s Thin Justice, by James G. Stewart
|
| Is International Law’s Thin Line of Justice Too Thin?, by Karen J. Alter |
| The Nexus among Peace, Justice and Human Rights, by Colleen Murphy |
| Thin Justice as an Escape from Koskenniemi’s Long Shadow?, by James G. Stewart |
| The Promise and Limits of Thin Justice: A response to the Contributors, by Steven Ratner |
|
Personal Blog
|
How
Would War Crimes Prosecutors Classify the Syrian Conflict(s)?, by James
G. Stewart
|
|
Personal Blog
|
«
Une Ville ou Une Localité, Même prise d’Assaut » : Les Mots Juridiquement
Redondants, Archaïques, Inutiles et Déroutants dans la Définition du Pillage
du CPI, by James G. Stewart
|
| “A Town or Place, Even When Taken by Assault”: The Legally Redundant, Archaic, Unnecessary, and Confusing Wording in the ICC’s Definition of Pillage, by James G. Stewart |
|
Hyeran Jo and Beth Simmons’ Article – Can
the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?
|
New
Symposium: Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity? by James
G. Stewart
|
| Hey Look at Me: Detereo, Ergo Sum, by Mark A. Drumbl |
| Can We Tell If the ICC Can Deter Atrocity? by Kate Cronin-Furman |
| Grounds for Continued Skepticism about the ICC’s Deterrence, by Julian Ku & Jide Nzelibe |
| Deterrence of and Through Other Actors, by James G. Stewart |
| The ICC Fails to Deter when Deterrence is Needed Most, by Alette Smeulers |
| ICC’s Effectiveness and the Explanatory Black Box: Deterrence or Cultural Prevention? by Joachim Savelsberg |
| Quo Vadimus? A Response to Critics, by Hyeran Jo and Beth Simmons |
|
Personal Blog
|
Judicial
Rejection of “Specific Direction” is Widespread, by James G. Stewart
|
|
Personal Blog
|
The
Argor Heraeus Decision on Corporate Pillage of Gold, by James G. Stewart
|
|
The Turn to Corporate Criminal Liability
for International Crimes – Reflections from Civil Society
|
Civil
Society’s Reflections on Corporate Responsibility for International Crimes:
An Introduction and Open Invitation, by James G. Stewart
|
| Corporate Criminal Responsibility for International Crimes? Yes Please, by Simon Taylor, Global Witness |
| One of the Missing Pieces in the Accountability Puzzle, by Arvind Ganesan, Human Rights Watch |
| Accountability for Economic War Crimes, by Holly Dranginis, Enough Project |
| Uncharted Territory, by Mark Taylor, Fafo Institute |
| Transitional Justice, Corporate Responsibility and Learning from the Global South, by Ruben Carranza, International Center for Transitional Justice |
| The Expressive Value of Corporate Prosecutions, by Wolfgang Kaleck and Miriam Saage-Maasz, European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights |
|
Personal Blog
|
Blackwater’s
Unsung Heroes, by James G. Stewart
|
|
Whither the International Criminal Court?
|
Symposium:
Whither the International Criminal Court? by James G. Stewart
|
| On the Independence of International Prosecutors, by Richard Goldstone |
| Power Politics and its Global Shadows: From Margins to Center, by Kamari Maxime Clarke |
| The Inevitably Difficult Choices a Prosecutor Faces, by Alex Whiting |
| The ICC Still Has a Chance, by Aryeh Neier |
| The Sort of Justice the ICC Can and Cannot Deliver, by Sarah Nouwen |
| The ICC’s Credibility Depends on Much More than Just Power Politics, by David Tolbert |
| Commerce and Atrocity: the Elephant in the Room, by James G. Stewart |
| A Court on The Rocks? Responding to the Rough Justice Reviews, by David Bosco |
|
Business and Human Rights – Next Steps
|
Symposium:
Business and Human Rights – Next Steps, by James G Stewart
|
| Closing Plenary Remarks, United Nations Forum on Business & Human Rights, Dec 2014, by John Ruggie |
| Corporate Human Rights Abuses and International Law: Brief Comments, by Surya Deva |
| Incorporating Rights: Making the Most of the Meantime, by Erika George |
| Human Rights, No Dogmas: The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, by John Tasioulas |
| A New Instrument for “Gross” Violations: Enthusiasm and Apprehension, by James G. Stewart |
| A First Step is Better than No Step At All, by Jenny Martinez |
| Would a Treaty Be All It Is Made Up to Be? by Frédéric Mégret |
| Life in the Global Public Domain: Response to Commentaries, by John Ruggie |
|
Complicity in the ICC Statute
|
What
is the ICC’s Standard for Complicity Really? by James Stewart
|
| Incorrect or Inappropriate: The ICC’s “Purpose” Standard of Complicity by Flavio Noto |
| Putting “Purpose” in Context by Sarah Finnin & Nema Milaninia |
| A Comparative Perspective on the “Purpose” Requirement by Cassandra Steer |
| The U.S. Model Penal Code’s Significance for Complicity in the ICC Statute: An American View by Adil Ahmad Haque |
| How to Interpret Complicity in the ICC Statute by Thomas Weigend |
| Interpreting “for the purpose of facilitating” in Article 25(3)(c)? by Elies van Sliedregt & Alex Popova |
| “En vue de”: The Significance of the French Equivalent of “Purpose” in the ICC Statute’s Complicity Provision by Robert Roth |
| An Important New Orthodoxy on Complicity in the ICC Statute?, James G. Stewart |
|
Sasha Greenawalt’s International Criminal
Law for Retributivists
|
Symposium:
Greenawalt’s International Criminal Law for Retributivists, James G.
Stewart
|
| Vive la Rétributivisme Timide! Sasha Greenawalt |
| Adjectival Retributivism: A Tale of Theory as Empath, Mark A. Drumbl |
| The Point of International Criminal Law, Adil Ahmad Haque |
| The Role and Weight of Desert, Sasha Greenawalt |
|
Personal Blog
|
Why Another Blog? James
G. Stewart
|